The Round Hill Society

Hollingdean Depot Nuisances

Living near a Waste Transfer Station
Sample nuisance diary 2009
[resident living at the summit of Princes Road]

Sunday 28th June
10.33 11.20 WTS: tipping (door 2 open)

Monday 29th June
10.40 13.20 Very heavy use of WTS and MRF
11.12 11.15 Door of MRF left half open
12.18 Beeping from reversing siren of large open top truck
12.43 Tipping within WTS with door 3 open
12.53 Tipping (involving glass) within WTS: disruptive even though door is closed
13.04 13.10 More glass tipped. Prolonged banging and rumbling.
16.25 16.30 rumbling, tipping, banging from WTS heard in south-facing living room with all windows on the north side of the house shut

Wednesday 1st July
11.55 11.59 Tipping within WTS with door 3 open

Thursday 2nd July
15.05 Prolonged beeping from reversing sirens as Yull & Dod SWT lorry reverses clockwise round WTS

Wednesday 8th July
11.55 11.59 Tipping within WTS with door 1 open; reversing sirens; 3-vehicle queue outside MRF for long period = engine noise.
15.30 15.35 Rumbling and banging from WTS

Thursday 9th July
9.15 9.35 rumbling from WTS audible both from south-facing front upstairs bedroom and rear (north-facing) kitchen with the windows shut
10.13 10.15 Smell of rubbish (probably carried by wind) in air outside
Two lots of tipping involving glass in quick succession from WTS A very bad day, absolutely confirming that the level of noise associated with permitted operation of WTS has drastically reduced the quality of my recreation in my own home and garden. This does not rest on violations of operating rules. The doors of the WTS do not reduce the noise significantly. The buildings rumble.
10.30 More glass tipping while door 3 in the process of shutting. More rumbling.
10.55 Tipping within WTS with door 3 open
11.07 Tipping within WTS with door 2 open
11.12 Heavy rumbling
11.20 Tipping within MRF with doors open
11.33 Very noisy tipping (glass) with door 2 of WTS open
11.40 Heavy rumbling from WTS
11.42 More glass tipping within WTS
Too much disturbance in a single morning.

Monday 13th July
Much less intensive use. A much quieter day. Able to enjoy gardening. Thank you.

Tuesday14th July
11.20 Reversing sirens, engine noise and banging
14.45 Glass tipping To reduce disturbance, I closed rear bathroom window which I had opened for ventilation. Closing the bathroom door does not shut it out.
16.25 A lot of rumbling from WTS. Annoyance: rear windows have to remain closed.


NOTES

Although I have recorded breaches of operating conditions, the noise nuisance is the product of authorized operation. The noise of tipping is not greatly reduced by doors being correctly closed. The WTS/MRF sheds bang and rumble. Although my property is several times nearer geographically to the MRF, the main nuisance source is without any doubt the noise from the WTS. Smell has not proved enough of an issue to complain about during the period of these records (1 windy day with poor air quality including the smell of rubbish). Noise is a factor of the WTS and MRF being in normal operation. There is marked variation from day to day on how intensively the WTS and MRF are being used. There are ‘quiet’ days when the facilities are ‘tolerable neighbours’ and days when it is unpleasant to use my rear garden and when I am frequently disturbed even on the south side of my home with all the north-facing (rear / double-glazed) windows of my home shut.

Engine noise and reversing sirens become especially irritable when the MRF and WTS are being intensively used. Nuisance is experienced when lorries, which halt at the one-armed barrier at the entrance, need engine power to set themselves in motion again. Every time a vehicle sets itself in motion to go to the southern perimeter (door 14) of the MRF, the shunt of its acceleration is very audible. Very heavy vehicles bound for the WTS, set themselves in motion in the same way. They then stop and reverse into door 2 or 3 of the WTS. Not only does this multiply the engine noise of the lorries pulling away, but there is the noise of the reversing sirens as well. The issue of both reversing sirens and the exhaust systems used by lorries was raised with John Collis of Veolia during the Public Meetings concerning the WTS/MRF planning applications. I recall assurances being given.

However, vehicles using the WTS are of so many different types and appear to come from so many different places that it is difficult to understand how any standard assurance could be given or what measures could be taken to ensure that all reversing alarms/sirens emit tolerable ‘white noise’ more acceptable to the ear (i.e. what is called ‘broadband sound’ in the industry). If this is already an observed condition, then I would also query why so many of these vehicles are doing so much reversing (e.g. the Yull & Dod SWT lorry which entertained me on 2nd July with a symphony of ‘beeps’ while reversing clockwise around the WTS) when the WTS has so many different doors. It appears that reversing is the standard way to enter the WTS, as if the facility was especially designed to give maximum ‘siren and engine noise’ to local residents. It does not help that Hollingdean Depot amplifies noise like an ancient auditorium, something which residents living on the north side of Princes Road will confirm. Either the WTS was very badly designed or it has been decided to use the design with minimum regard to local residents.

A mic has appeared on the greenfield site where Carelet wishes to house new residents opposite a Waste Transfer Station. But why is the developer's noise assessment being performed after the formal consultation period is over? Assessing whether an area is fit for decent homes should be a developer's very first concern, before bothering to employ an architect. This is such an important area for comment that it warrants re-application. The site is not suitable for residential accommodation for factors which are being considered as afterthoughts.
Veolia's WTS (N. of railway) and the greenfield site (S.) where Carelet wishes to create a 2nd building line: 4 houses with no street at the front.

The proposed back gardens (new residents' amenity-space) would face the WTS.
Below: Waste Transfer Station from rear of the residential properties (north side of Princes Road from a distance. Carelet proposes to house new residents right opposite the main lorry entrance to both WTS and MRF!)

Following feedback I gave to Alison Walters about what life is like near a Materials Recovery Facility, I have had several complaints, which I fully endorse, on (a) 'Saturday working' during a bank holiday weekend, not after one, as permitted in condition 5, (b) on the growing nuisance of noise experienced by residents on both sides of Princes Road and (c) on the smell of rubbish experienced by residents living to the N and NE of Princes Road. I am especially concerned at the effects on noise levels and health when the entry and exit doors of Veolia's industrial units remain open for prolonged periods of time. This is happening now with the MRF. My back garden overlooks the entry door(s) of the MRF, but a long convoy of vehicles entering would also have to exit. I therefore expect that residents and school children in Ditchling Road have to put up with a lot of rumbling from inside the industrial unit as well.

Below: Materials Recovery Facility from rear of the residential properties (north side of Princes Road).

The vehicles outside cannot possibly enter until the vehicle inside gets out of the way. All the time, the door remains open.

Observations of a Round Hill resident The rear of my garden faces the main entrance door of The Materials Recovery Facility. I have noticed that this door remains open for very long stretches of time, while vehicles (standing in a very long queue) wait to get in. I noticed such queues, particularly bad on Wednesday 29th April 2009. The rumbling coming through the open door has made being out in my own back garden very unpleasant. I have again had to retreat from my back garden today (Monday 11th May 2009) where I wanted to hang out clean washing. It is suitably windy today for drying washing (the historical pursuit in Round Hill), but the smell from the MRF is being carried about by the wind.

I am not alone in my discomfort, a resident living on the the south side of Princes Road, reported the nuisance earlier. She followed up her complaint on 28th April: Brother came round today and he could hear the rumbling noise I talked about. It is very intrusive.

Condition 16 of the MRF's operating conditions states that "All vehicle access doors to the Waste Transfer Station and Materials Recovery Facility shall remain closed except to enable the ingress and egress of vehicles.

However, if the doors are open for a prolonged period of time while several vehicles wait to enter, the exception in condition 16 undermines the safety and nuisance concerns which the condition is meant to address.

The vehicles queue to get in on the south side of Hollingdean Depot (nearest to Round Hill), where the Case Officer (Maria Seale) regretted that there wasn't room for any on-site landscaping. Trees and soft-landscaping would dampen the noise.

Report on noise and odour from the WTS and MRF from Round Hill resident

I have lived in Princes Road for 32 years. When I moved here the abattoir certainly contributed to noise. The smell of animal carcasses and disinfectant could certainly be detected by residents taking a stroll down Hollingdean Lane. However, I do not recall the odour of the abattoir carrying into Princes Road.

Worst smell on record in Princes Road
The Waste Transfer Station and Materials Recovery Facility have proved, even in the early months of operation, to be far noisier and smellier neighbours. On 4th August, the day before my summer holiday, I photographed yet another breach of The Waste Transfer Station's operating conditions. On my return, I found a message from residents living on the south side of Princes Road, drawing my attention to the dreadful odour of rubbish in Princes Road on 11th August. The day after my return on 13th August, the whiff of stale rubbish hit me as I opened my front door. It was being carried in gusts of wind. I experienced this nuisance from several vantage points in Princes Road. Previously, I had told the Council's Environmental Health Officer that the main nuisance was noise, having only experienced isolated instances of disagreeable odour. The strength and prevalence of the smell which I experienced on 13th August have convinced me that there are two major nuisances which need to be addressed.

Related article
See Life Near The Dump - logging local residents' comments for the continued nuisance of odour from the WTS reported by Round Hill and other residents in 2010.

This page was last updated by Ted on 02-Jan-2013